The AwayWeek editorial promise
Good stories.
Grounded in something.
A beautiful place deserves more than a beautiful sentence. Here is how we approach the work behind our travel stories.
Start with a useful question.
Our aim is to help you understand a place and make a better trip decision. That can mean comparing destinations, explaining a change that affects a region, or untangling the practical details of a visit. A headline should give you a reason to read, and the story should deliver on it.
Make the sources easy to follow.
For factual claims, we favor the people and institutions closest to the information: public agencies, park managers, official transport providers, researchers, and venues. Tourism organizations are useful for orientation; their promotional descriptions are not independent evidence that a hotel, tour or destination is the best.
Our long-form articles link their research and record source-check dates. Destination introductions link the official resources behind their planning notes. When figures use different time periods or definitions, we explain the distinction rather than combining them into a more exciting number.
Be clear about what we know.
A researched guide is not automatically a first-person travel account. We do not imply that we visited a place, stayed in a hotel, tested a tour, or interviewed someone unless that actually happened. Suggested pacing and comparisons are editorial judgments; they are not measured rankings or promises about your trip.
Use AI with editorial responsibility.
AI tools assist with research organization, drafting and site production. A generated answer is not a source. Publication requires a named approval and checks for sources, image provenance and completeness. We identify AI-created illustrative scenes where they appear; they do not represent photographed hotels or bookable properties.
Show who is responsible.
Stories carrying the AwayWeek byline are published under the journal's editorial responsibility. The About page explains that byline. We do not create fictional travel experts or credentials to make a story appear more authoritative.
Credit the view.
Article photographs carry credits and provenance information. We distinguish licensed or supplied photography from illustrations. A striking image is an invitation to explore, not evidence that a property has been inspected or an experience has been reviewed.
Keep commercial links in context.
Some pages contain affiliate links. We may earn a commission from a qualifying booking. Those links are disclosed and marked as sponsored for search engines. A provider link is a booking option, not proof of a personal endorsement. Read our affiliate disclosure for more.
Update facts when the facts change.
Publication and update dates describe the article's history. We do not refresh a story's date simply to make it look new. Access, prices, schedules and transport details can change after a source check; follow the linked provider for information relevant to your dates.
Make corrections part of the work.
If something needs a closer look, send the page URL, the detail you believe is wrong, and a supporting source. We assess the evidence and correct the page when warranted. Material corrections should be explained in the story; spelling and formatting fixes need not become a new publication date.
Send a correction or a story idea